Simplified XNA Message Boxes

June 11, 2009 by Dave
Filed under: C#, Game Programming, XNA 

Shawn Hargreaves brings up the subject of how annoying async coding can be.  Calling a “begin” method, dealing with the completion callback function, handling the results – it’s all very ugly to keep track of, and often leads to very ugly code.

He wants to be able to write code like this (and so do I)…

 

 int? button = Guide.ShowMessageBox("Save Game",
                                       "Do you want to save your progress?",
                                       new string[] { "OK", "Cancel" },
                                       0, MessageBoxIcon.None);

    if (button == 0)
    {
        StorageDevice storageDevice = Guide.ShowStorageDeviceSelector();

        if (storageDevice != null)
        {
            using (StorageContainer storageContainer = storageDevice.OpenContainer("foo"))
            {
                ...
            }
        }
    }

 

 

It turns out that making async code work almost like this isn’t too bad to do. It basically involves creating a static class to encapsulate all of the various things you need to keep track of. Here is the fairly well commented code for the static class.

class SimpleMessageBox
  {
    private static int? dialogResult = null;
    public static bool Showing { get; set; }

    public static int? ShowMessageBox(string title, string text, IEnumerable  buttons, int focusButton, MessageBoxIcon icon)
    {
      // don't do anything if the guide is visible - one issue this handles is showing dialogs in quick
      // succession, we have to wait for the guide to go away before the next dialog can display
      if (Guide.IsVisible) return null;

      // if we have a result then we're all done and we want to return it
      if (dialogResult != null)
      {
        // preserve the result
        int? saveResult = dialogResult;

        // reset everything for the next message box
        dialogResult = null;
        Showing = false;

        // return the result
        return saveResult;
      }

      // return nothing if the message box is still being displayed
      if (Showing) return null;

      // otherwise show it
      Showing = true;
      Guide.BeginShowMessageBox(title, text, buttons, focusButton, icon, MessageBoxEnd, null);
      return null;
    }

    private static void MessageBoxEnd(IAsyncResult result)
    {
      dialogResult = Guide.EndShowMessageBox(result);

      // if no button was pressed then we want the result to be -1
      if (dialogResult == null)
        dialogResult = -1;
    }

 

Using the class involves calling SimpleMessageBox.ShowMessage(…) in your Update() method. You continue to call it each frame until it returns a result. This does require some game state information (i.e. your game state is SaveGameState or something similar) so it takes a little extra work, but you have to keep track of those sorts of states anyway.

Here’s a sample of the usage:

protected override void Update(GameTime gameTime)
    {
      base.Update(gameTime);

      if (saveGame)
      {
        // show the message box - we end up calling this each frame as long as we're in the saveGame state - it will
        // return null until the user presses a button or closes the guide - it returns -1 if the guide
        // is closed, otherwise it returns the button number
        int? button = SimpleMessageBox.ShowMessageBox("Save Game", "Do you want to save your progress?",
                                                      new string[] { "OK", "Cancel", "Repeat" }, 0, MessageBoxIcon.None);

        switch (button)
        {
          case -1:
            message = "No Button";
            saveGame = false;
            break;

          case 0:
            message = "Saved";
            saveGame = false;
            break;

          case 1:
            message = "Cancelled";
            saveGame = false;
            break;

          case 2:
            message = "Repeat";
            break;
        }
      }
    }

 

I haven’t use this code in a real project yet (just the sample), but it seems like it would work in quite a few situations. It’s a bit different than doing a message box in Windows since you have to realize you’re calling the ShowMessageBox method each frame. That aside, you can almost imagine that you’re using a blocking message box function.

Download Sample Project

Comments

2 Comments on Simplified XNA Message Boxes

  1. ferhat on Sat, 11th Dec 2010 5:28 pm
  2. cool…

  3. snoozbuster on Tue, 14th Jun 2011 12:42 am
  4. This code is actually really handy. If you’re just displaying a notification, i.e. “There is no storage device selected, saving is disabled,” you don’t even have to call it every frame. It’s handy. However, in 3.1 the BeginShowMessageBox() function with the overload to display to all players was removed. I thought that odd. What I did to resolve it was just used a Press Start screen to set the default controller, as is the norm. It’s really useful code, for sure. I did make the class static, though, since everything inside is already static. I don’t know if that was an oversight or not, cause you don’t really need to instantiate this class.

Tell me what you're thinking...